Talk:Return of Mechazod!

From Hearthstone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Is this table even correct??[edit source]

What does the table even mean? "Single match"? Only uses bomb salvo a max of 3 times? I call baloney on this table. Was the original author trying to find out whether Mechazod's attack algorithm was non-random, then abandoned the table project? Aegonostic (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

The numbers below represent the maximum number of times that card has so far been seen in a single match.

Class Card No
Tavern Brawl Prioritize 3
Bomb Salvo 3
Double Zap 4
Kill the Lorewalker 2*
Overclock 4

Aegonostic (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

The meaning is as stated: each number represents the highest number of times an editor has seen that particular card being used in a single match. As to what "single match" means, it means "a match", "one match". As far as "baloney" goes, you seem to have overlooked "has so far been seen": it's not saying this is the maximum, it's saying he has at least that many copies of each of those cards.
Regarding its purpose, you didn't quote the previous sentence, "It is unknown whether Mechazod uses a traditional deck and hand.". The idea was for editors to contribute, to try to establish how many times Mechazod might play the same card in a match, or if he simply generates cards on the fly. In theory, if he does use a deck, and he only has e.g. 5 copies of Bomb Salvo, it would be useful to know when he used his fifth that he had no more to play. -- Taohinton (talk) 06:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Having said this, I've gone over the notes again, and it seems unlikely that Mechazod uses a deck anyway. I've therefore expanded the notes, and removed the table. As explained in the notes, the length of the match and anti-repetition algorithms make the point fairly moot anyway. -- Taohinton (talk) 14:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
I've played over 150 games of this brawl in the past, so I can safely that Mechazod definitely is able to use more than 5 Bomb Salvos per match, and same goes with the other abilities. Thanks for removing the table. Aegonostic (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)