The subject of this article has
an entry in the Editor's Handbook.
For background information and
guides on maintaining this article,
see New expansions.
Hi, I think this line should be changed: "However, with Standard format in mind, the developers now plan to have a new expansion at both the start and end of each year, with an adventure somewhere in between." I think the word "plan" is too strong an interpretation of the source material cited:
"What interests Trump, however, are the suggested plans for 2016 and 2017. Rather than continuing a cadence of expansion-adventure-expansion-adventure, Blizzard lays out a timeline with two expansions per year — one at the start, one near the end — and a single adventure between them. If this new formula were to stay consistent, the much bigger expansions would greatly outnumber the smaller and more single-player-focused adventure sets.
"'It's not what we've done so far, but maybe that's the right thing for the future,' Donais says. 'We haven't decided whether adventures should be as common as expansions or not. Maybe the rate of 1-to-1 is not right.'"
The source article shows they are/were thinking about changing the pattern, not that they have decided to do so.
22.214.171.124 17:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)CheezCurls