Talk:Classic card list

From Hearthstone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Missing cards[edit source]

Faceless Manipulator isn't listed here, and some of the cards listed as neutre are class-specific.--MisterSanderson (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Faceless Manipulator wasn't being shown here due I assume to buffering delays since the card set was changed for all the previously 'Expert' cards (now 'Classic'). This can be fixed just by resaving the data page and/or content page for the card, without actually making any changes. There are probably a few others missing too, but they should auto-reappear once the servers catch up.
The data in the table is automatically drawn up based on the card data (eg Data:Cards/Faceless_Manipulator(450)) for each card. I had a quick look through the neutral cards but couldn't spot any class ones, but if you notice any data that's definitely wrong (always worth checking it on Hearthpwn first to confirm), please do correct it in the card data itself, as well as on the page itself if necessary. The table will then automatically show the updated info. -- Taohinton (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Missing table[edit source]

The last edit appears to have completely wiped the table. Can anyone else confirm this and revert it? 04:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Not confirmed, I can see the table just fine. The default state of the table is collapsed, you have to click the "Show" link to uncollapse the table. Is the "Show" link not showing up for you? It should be in the first column of the table in the first table cell. Xinhuan (talk) 07:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Missing one card somewhere!....[edit source]

I counted and recounted this list to be 244 cards, one short of the 245 cards for the Classic set. A card is missing from this list, someone help find it please. 09:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

  • The missing card is "Ice Block", please someone add it to the list (requested on February 5, 2016). 09:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Ice Block is now showing up properly in the list. It was likely due to the wiki upgrades taking place at the time (or else a caching issue), but at any rate it's there now. -- Taohinton (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)