Should Tundra Rhino not be related to Charge rather than an actual Charge minion? I'm fully aware that there is no occasion where he doesn't have charge while the effect is active, since he as a beast is affected by his own text, but just in case (maybe in the future you can override tribes with spells?) shouldn't we put it in related? AchedTeacher (talk) 15:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- The current system is for the first section to include "all cards which possess or provide a source of Charge". (I've just added this explicitly.) "Related cards" is currently for cards which have a special relationship to Charge itself. This makes it a lot easier to find synergy cards.
- The confusion probably stems from the different system previously used for minion type pages, where cards which generated minions of that type were included in the Related cards section; this has since been remedied by pushing the MediaWiki a little to include three types of list. Ability pages don't currently distinguish between those which have the ability and those which grant/provide a source of the ability. -- Taohinton (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)